Axis Communications’ Pixel density and DORI white paper describes four common operational requirements for video interpreted by people: detection, observation, recognition, and identification. In the paper, detection means determining whether a person is present; observation adds characteristic detail; recognition supports deciding whether someone is the same person seen before; and identification requires enough information to identify the person.
\nThe paper relates those tasks to a pixel-density model derived from IEC 62676-4. Its planning values are 25 pixels per meter for detection, 63 px/m for observation, 125 px/m for recognition, and 250 px/m for identification. The same paper warns that this is a simplified model. Lighting direction, optics, compression, distance, pose, scene geometry, and the resolution of the display used by an operator can change the practical result. The values apply to visual images interpreted by people; analytics and thermal imaging need their own performance definitions.
\nPixel density also changes across a scene. A person farther from the lens occupies fewer pixels than one near it, while a wide overview spreads the sensor’s pixels across more space. A high sensor resolution therefore does not automatically create identification coverage everywhere in the image. The source describes planning and validation tools, including site design, lens calculation, and an on-camera pixel counter, but none replaces a real-scene acceptance test.
\n\nStart with the decision the video must support, not a camera model. Mark the exact line, doorway, counter, lane, or area where the task matters and assign one intended result: detect, observe, recognize, or identify. Record the expected target direction, distance band, lighting, movement, and viewing method. A parking-lot overview and an identification view at an employee entrance are different requirements even when one camera can see both.
\nWhen one view must provide both overview and identification, make both requirements explicit. The answer may be a narrower lens, a second camera, a multidirectional device, or a dedicated identification view. Do not silently downgrade the requirement because a broad field of view looks impressive on a wall monitor.
\nKeep an acceptance image for every critical test point, along with camera model, lens position, stream settings, date, lighting condition, result, exception, and approver. Revalidate after a camera is moved, refocused, replaced, re-encoded, or obstructed, and after a material change to the scene. The durable outcome is not “eight megapixels installed”; it is a recorded image that performs the defined job at the defined place.
\n\n