{ "api_version": "1", "kind": "dse_post", "self": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "item": { "id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "slug": "design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "alternate_urls": { "markdown": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory.md", "json": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/" }, "title": "Design Prometheus recovery beyond a single local data directory", "summary": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.", "format": { "slug": "guide", "name": "Guide" }, "priority": { "slug": "info", "name": "Information" }, "featured": false, "image": { "theme": "continuity-recovery", "label": "Continuity & recovery", "alt": "Paired infrastructure paths converging on a stable recovered service.", "card_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-card.webp?v=1.8.20", "hero_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-hero.webp?v=1.8.20", "social_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 2400, "height": 1350 }, "topics": [ { "slug": "it", "name": "IT", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/" }, { "slug": "networks-infrastructure", "name": "Networks & Infrastructure", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/networks-infrastructure/" } ], "author": { "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "type": "Organization" }, "publisher": { "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/" }, "published_at": "2026-10-20T18:15:42+00:00", "modified_at": "2026-10-20T18:34:33+00:00", "reviewed_on": "2026-10-20", "reading_minutes": 2, "word_count": 249, "potentially_affected": "Review Prometheus local TSDB backup, supported filesystem and local retention policy.", "dse_recommendation": "DSE recommends defining the acceptable history loss and restoration time before selecting storage and retention.", "primary_source": { "name": "Prometheus documentation — Storage", "url": "https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/storage/", "published_on": null, "authority": "prometheus.io" }, "publishing_principles": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usage_info": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyright_notice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "content_html": "

Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.

\n

Source facts

\n

Prometheus documents that its local storage is neither clustered nor replicated and should be managed like another single-node database. It recommends snapshots for backups. Its storage guidance cautions against unsupported non-POSIX filesystems and states that NFS filesystems are unsupported. If time- and size-based retention policies are both specified, whichever triggers first is used.

\n

Source: Prometheus documentation — Storage.

\n

Applicability

\n

Review Prometheus local TSDB backup, supported filesystem and local retention policy.

\n

DSE recommendation

\n

DSE recommends defining the acceptable history loss and restoration time before selecting storage and retention. Keep a supported snapshot-based backup procedure and an inventory of configuration, rules, and credentials needed to rebuild the service. Leave space for ongoing ingestion and storage maintenance rather than allocating the entire disk to retained blocks. Do not present a mounted shared filesystem as replication without checking the documented storage requirements. Protect the restore path from the same failure that could destroy the active node.

\n

Verification

\n

In a nonproduction recovery exercise, restore an approved snapshot and required configuration to a separate instance. Verify representative historical queries and current collection after the restore. Record the actual recovery boundary and any missing interval rather than claiming retention duration alone proves resilience. Retain snapshot identity, restored time coverage and the destination filesystem with the result. Have the monitoring owner approve the observed missing interval and recovery time separately from the configured local retention target.

\n

Official reference

\n

Prometheus documentation — Storage. Reviewed October 20, 2026.

", "content_text": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.\nSource facts\nPrometheus documents that its local storage is neither clustered nor replicated and should be managed like another single-node database. It recommends snapshots for backups. Its storage guidance cautions against unsupported non-POSIX filesystems and states that NFS filesystems are unsupported. If time- and size-based retention policies are both specified, whichever triggers first is used.\nSource: Prometheus documentation — Storage.\nApplicability\nReview Prometheus local TSDB backup, supported filesystem and local retention policy.\nDSE recommendation\nDSE recommends defining the acceptable history loss and restoration time before selecting storage and retention. Keep a supported snapshot-based backup procedure and an inventory of configuration, rules, and credentials needed to rebuild the service. Leave space for ongoing ingestion and storage maintenance rather than allocating the entire disk to retained blocks. Do not present a mounted shared filesystem as replication without checking the documented storage requirements. Protect the restore path from the same failure that could destroy the active node.\nVerification\nIn a nonproduction recovery exercise, restore an approved snapshot and required configuration to a separate instance. Verify representative historical queries and current collection after the restore. Record the actual recovery boundary and any missing interval rather than claiming retention duration alone proves resilience. Retain snapshot identity, restored time coverage and the destination filesystem with the result. Have the monitoring owner approve the observed missing interval and recovery time separately from the configured local retention target.\nOfficial reference\nPrometheus documentation — Storage. Reviewed October 20, 2026.", "content_markdown": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.\n\n## Source facts\n\nPrometheus documents that its local storage is neither clustered nor replicated and should be managed like another single-node database. It recommends snapshots for backups. Its storage guidance cautions against unsupported non-POSIX filesystems and states that NFS filesystems are unsupported. If time- and size-based retention policies are both specified, whichever triggers first is used.\n\nSource: [Prometheus documentation — Storage](https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/storage/).\n\n## Applicability\n\nReview Prometheus local TSDB backup, supported filesystem and local retention policy.\n\n## DSE recommendation\n\nDSE recommends defining the acceptable history loss and restoration time before selecting storage and retention. Keep a supported snapshot-based backup procedure and an inventory of configuration, rules, and credentials needed to rebuild the service. Leave space for ongoing ingestion and storage maintenance rather than allocating the entire disk to retained blocks. Do not present a mounted shared filesystem as replication without checking the documented storage requirements. Protect the restore path from the same failure that could destroy the active node.\n\n## Verification\n\nIn a nonproduction recovery exercise, restore an approved snapshot and required configuration to a separate instance. Verify representative historical queries and current collection after the restore. Record the actual recovery boundary and any missing interval rather than claiming retention duration alone proves resilience. Retain snapshot identity, restored time coverage and the destination filesystem with the result. Have the monitoring owner approve the observed missing interval and recovery time separately from the configured local retention target.\n\n## Official reference\n\n[Prometheus documentation — Storage](https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/storage/). Reviewed October 20, 2026." }, "json_ld": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization", "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "alternateName": "DSE Security", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/dse-logo-20260812.png?v=1.8.20" } }, { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "parentOrganization": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" } }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website", "name": "DSE Updates", "alternateName": "DSE Security Knowledge Hub", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "inLanguage": "en-US", "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "potentialAction": { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": { "@type": "EntryPoint", "urlTemplate": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/?q={search_term_string}" }, "query-input": "required name=search_term_string" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website" }, "lastReviewed": "2026-10-20" }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/#breadcrumbs", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "DSE Updates", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "IT", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Design Prometheus recovery beyond a single local data directory", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/" } ] }, { "@type": [ "Article", "TechArticle" ], "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/#article", "identifier": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/", "headline": "Design Prometheus recovery beyond a single local data directory", "description": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.", "abstract": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.", "articleBody": "Long retention on one disk is different from replicated and recoverable monitoring history.\nSource facts\nPrometheus documents that its local storage is neither clustered nor replicated and should be managed like another single-node database. It recommends snapshots for backups. Its storage guidance cautions against unsupported non-POSIX filesystems and states that NFS filesystems are unsupported. If time- and size-based retention policies are both specified, whichever triggers first is used.\nSource: Prometheus documentation — Storage.\nApplicability\nReview Prometheus local TSDB backup, supported filesystem and local retention policy.\nDSE recommendation\nDSE recommends defining the acceptable history loss and restoration time before selecting storage and retention. Keep a supported snapshot-based backup procedure and an inventory of configuration, rules, and credentials needed to rebuild the service. Leave space for ongoing ingestion and storage maintenance rather than allocating the entire disk to retained blocks. Do not present a mounted shared filesystem as replication without checking the documented storage requirements. Protect the restore path from the same failure that could destroy the active node.\nVerification\nIn a nonproduction recovery exercise, restore an approved snapshot and required configuration to a separate instance. Verify representative historical queries and current collection after the restore. Record the actual recovery boundary and any missing interval rather than claiming retention duration alone proves resilience. Retain snapshot identity, restored time coverage and the destination filesystem with the result. Have the monitoring owner approve the observed missing interval and recovery time separately from the configured local retention target.\nOfficial reference\nPrometheus documentation — Storage. Reviewed October 20, 2026.", "datePublished": "2026-10-20T18:15:42+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-10-20T18:34:33+00:00", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "isAccessibleForFree": true, "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/design-prometheus-recovery-beyond-a-single-local-data-directory/#primaryimage", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "contentUrl": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 1200, "height": 630, "caption": "Design Prometheus recovery beyond a single local data directory" }, "articleSection": [ "IT", "Networks & Infrastructure" ], "keywords": [ "IT", "Networks & Infrastructure", "Guide", "Information priority" ], "genre": "Guide", "about": [ { "@type": "Thing", "name": "IT", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/" }, { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Networks & Infrastructure", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/networks-infrastructure/" } ], "wordCount": 249, "timeRequired": "PT2M", "publishingPrinciples": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usageInfo": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyrightHolder": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "copyrightNotice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "citation": { "@type": "CreativeWork", "name": "Prometheus documentation — Storage", "url": "https://prometheus.io/docs/prometheus/latest/storage/" } } ] } }