{
    "api_version": "1",
    "kind": "dse_post",
    "self": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
    "item": {
        "id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
        "slug": "keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard",
        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
        "alternate_urls": {
            "markdown": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard.md",
            "json": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/"
        },
        "title": "Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard",
        "summary": "Use Remote Credential Guard to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
        "format": {
            "slug": "guide",
            "name": "Guide"
        },
        "priority": {
            "slug": "advisory",
            "name": "Advisory"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "image": {
            "theme": "physical-security",
            "label": "Physical security",
            "alt": "Integrated video surveillance and controlled entry at a modern commercial facility.",
            "card_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/physical-security-card.webp?v=1.8.20",
            "hero_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/physical-security-hero.webp?v=1.8.20",
            "social_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/physical-security-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
            "width": 2400,
            "height": 1350
        },
        "topics": [
            {
                "slug": "cybersecurity",
                "name": "Cybersecurity",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/"
            },
            {
                "slug": "it",
                "name": "IT",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/"
            }
        ],
        "author": {
            "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
            "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team",
            "type": "Organization"
        },
        "publisher": {
            "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering",
            "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/"
        },
        "published_at": "2026-08-27T12:13:42+00:00",
        "modified_at": "2026-08-27T13:01:31+00:00",
        "reviewed_on": "2026-08-26",
        "reading_minutes": 3,
        "word_count": 476,
        "potentially_affected": "Teams, systems, services, or facilities within the stated scope of Remote Credential Guard",
        "dse_recommendation": "Compare the observed state with the cited official source, document applicability and exceptions, and test any approved change with rollback safeguards.",
        "primary_source": {
            "name": "Remote Credential Guard",
            "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard",
            "published_on": "2026-03-29",
            "authority": "Microsoft Learn"
        },
        "publishing_principles": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/",
        "usage_info": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/",
        "copyright_notice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.",
        "content_html": "<p>Use this document to connect an official requirement or behavior to observable evidence: Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.</p>\n<h2>Source fact:</h2>\n<p>The official <a href=\"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Remote Credential Guard</a> from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Remote Credential Guard redirects Kerberos requests to the originating device instead of sending credentials to the RDP target. The research record locates this support at <strong>Opening overview</strong>.</li>\n<li>It protects credentials and derivatives from a compromised target while retaining Remote Desktop single sign-on. The research record locates this support at <strong>Opening overview</strong>.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Keep the evidence boundary at these traced claims. They support a review of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows; they do not support conclusions outside the source&#8217;s stated conditions.</p>\n<h2>What the source does not establish</h2>\n<p>Confirm OS, domain, Kerberos, delegation, and client requirements before requiring it. It does not establish a deployment&#8217;s current state, authorize a production change, prove compliance, or show that Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations are healthy. Documented options are review inputs, not universal mandates.</p>\n<h2>Applicability questions</h2>\n<ul>\n<li>For source statement 1 at <strong>Opening overview</strong>, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?</li>\n<li>For source statement 2 at <strong>Opening overview</strong>, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?</li>\n<li>Which deployed instance of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows will be compared with the source, and why that instance?</li>\n<li>How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations?</li>\n<li>Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?</li>\n</ul>\n<h2>DSE recommendation:</h2>\n<p>DSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Anchor the review in the cited section and keep observation separate from interpretation. Record the source location, examined part of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.</p>\n<p>An implementation decision needs an owner, approved window, prechecks, observable outcome, stop authority, and rollback path. Validate Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations before and after the test, and store only sanitized operational evidence.</p>\n<h2>Verification and evidence</h2>\n<p>Tie each conclusion back to <strong>Opening overview</strong>; <strong>Opening overview</strong> and to observable material such as policy and feature state, security events, test detections, administrative assignments, exception approvals, and response tickets. Preserve provenance and stable identifiers without copying secrets into the evidence set.</p>\n<p>Preserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.</p>\n<h2>Official references</h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Remote Credential Guard</a> — Microsoft</li>\n</ul>",
        "content_text": "Use this document to connect an official requirement or behavior to observable evidence: Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official Remote Credential Guard from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\nRemote Credential Guard redirects Kerberos requests to the originating device instead of sending credentials to the RDP target. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\nIt protects credentials and derivatives from a compromised target while retaining Remote Desktop single sign-on. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\n\nKeep the evidence boundary at these traced claims. They support a review of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows; they do not support conclusions outside the source’s stated conditions.\nWhat the source does not establish\nConfirm OS, domain, Kerberos, delegation, and client requirements before requiring it. It does not establish a deployment’s current state, authorize a production change, prove compliance, or show that Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations are healthy. Documented options are review inputs, not universal mandates.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Anchor the review in the cited section and keep observation separate from interpretation. Record the source location, examined part of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nAn implementation decision needs an owner, approved window, prechecks, observable outcome, stop authority, and rollback path. Validate Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations before and after the test, and store only sanitized operational evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nTie each conclusion back to Opening overview; Opening overview and to observable material such as policy and feature state, security events, test detections, administrative assignments, exception approvals, and response tickets. Preserve provenance and stable identifiers without copying secrets into the evidence set.\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\nOfficial references\n\nRemote Credential Guard — Microsoft",
        "content_markdown": "Use this document to connect an official requirement or behavior to observable evidence: Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\n\n## Source fact:\n\nThe official [Remote Credential Guard](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard) from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\n- Remote Credential Guard redirects Kerberos requests to the originating device instead of sending credentials to the RDP target. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\n\n- It protects credentials and derivatives from a compromised target while retaining Remote Desktop single sign-on. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\n\nKeep the evidence boundary at these traced claims. They support a review of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows; they do not support conclusions outside the source’s stated conditions.\n\n## What the source does not establish\n\nConfirm OS, domain, Kerberos, delegation, and client requirements before requiring it. It does not establish a deployment’s current state, authorize a production change, prove compliance, or show that Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations are healthy. Documented options are review inputs, not universal mandates.\n\n## Applicability questions\n\n- For source statement 1 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- For source statement 2 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- Which deployed instance of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\n\n- How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations?\n\n- Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\n## DSE recommendation:\n\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Anchor the review in the cited section and keep observation separate from interpretation. Record the source location, examined part of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\n\nAn implementation decision needs an owner, approved window, prechecks, observable outcome, stop authority, and rollback path. Validate Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations before and after the test, and store only sanitized operational evidence.\n\n## Verification and evidence\n\nTie each conclusion back to Opening overview; Opening overview and to observable material such as policy and feature state, security events, test detections, administrative assignments, exception approvals, and response tickets. Preserve provenance and stable identifiers without copying secrets into the evidence set.\n\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\n\n## Official references\n\n- [Remote Credential Guard](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard) — Microsoft"
    },
    "json_ld": {
        "@context": "https://schema.org",
        "@graph": [
            {
                "@type": "Organization",
                "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization",
                "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering",
                "alternateName": "DSE Security",
                "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/",
                "logo": {
                    "@type": "ImageObject",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/dse-logo-20260812.png?v=1.8.20"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "Organization",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team",
                "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/",
                "parentOrganization": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "WebSite",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website",
                "name": "DSE Updates",
                "alternateName": "DSE Security Knowledge Hub",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/",
                "inLanguage": "en-US",
                "publisher": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "potentialAction": {
                    "@type": "SearchAction",
                    "target": {
                        "@type": "EntryPoint",
                        "urlTemplate": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/?q={search_term_string}"
                    },
                    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "WebPage",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
                "isPartOf": {
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website"
                },
                "lastReviewed": "2026-08-26"
            },
            {
                "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/#breadcrumbs",
                "itemListElement": [
                    {
                        "@type": "ListItem",
                        "position": 1,
                        "name": "DSE Updates",
                        "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/"
                    },
                    {
                        "@type": "ListItem",
                        "position": 2,
                        "name": "Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard",
                        "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "@type": [
                    "Article",
                    "TechArticle"
                ],
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/#article",
                "identifier": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/",
                "headline": "Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard",
                "description": "Use Remote Credential Guard to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
                "abstract": "Use Remote Credential Guard to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
                "articleBody": "Use this document to connect an official requirement or behavior to observable evidence: Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official Remote Credential Guard from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\nRemote Credential Guard redirects Kerberos requests to the originating device instead of sending credentials to the RDP target. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\nIt protects credentials and derivatives from a compromised target while retaining Remote Desktop single sign-on. The research record locates this support at Opening overview.\n\nKeep the evidence boundary at these traced claims. They support a review of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows; they do not support conclusions outside the source’s stated conditions.\nWhat the source does not establish\nConfirm OS, domain, Kerberos, delegation, and client requirements before requiring it. It does not establish a deployment’s current state, authorize a production change, prove compliance, or show that Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations are healthy. Documented options are review inputs, not universal mandates.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at Opening overview, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Anchor the review in the cited section and keep observation separate from interpretation. Record the source location, examined part of Windows security controls, protected identities, audit policy, telemetry, exclusions, administrative roles, and response workflows, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nAn implementation decision needs an owner, approved window, prechecks, observable outcome, stop authority, and rollback path. Validate Active Directory, Windows DNS, certificate trust, time, endpoint management, telemetry pipelines, and security operations before and after the test, and store only sanitized operational evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nTie each conclusion back to Opening overview; Opening overview and to observable material such as policy and feature state, security events, test detections, administrative assignments, exception approvals, and response tickets. Preserve provenance and stable identifiers without copying secrets into the evidence set.\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\nOfficial references\n\nRemote Credential Guard — Microsoft",
                "datePublished": "2026-08-27T12:13:42+00:00",
                "dateModified": "2026-08-27T13:01:31+00:00",
                "mainEntityOfPage": {
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/"
                },
                "inLanguage": "en-US",
                "isAccessibleForFree": true,
                "author": {
                    "@type": "Organization",
                    "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team"
                },
                "publisher": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "image": {
                    "@type": "ImageObject",
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/keep-rdp-credentials-off-target-with-remote-credential-guard/#primaryimage",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/physical-security-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
                    "contentUrl": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/physical-security-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
                    "width": 1200,
                    "height": 630,
                    "caption": "Keep RDP credentials off the target with Remote Credential Guard"
                },
                "articleSection": [
                    "Cybersecurity",
                    "IT"
                ],
                "keywords": [
                    "Cybersecurity",
                    "IT",
                    "Guide",
                    "Advisory priority"
                ],
                "genre": "Guide",
                "about": [
                    {
                        "@type": "Thing",
                        "name": "Cybersecurity",
                        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/"
                    },
                    {
                        "@type": "Thing",
                        "name": "IT",
                        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/"
                    }
                ],
                "wordCount": 476,
                "timeRequired": "PT3M",
                "publishingPrinciples": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/",
                "usageInfo": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/",
                "copyrightHolder": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "copyrightNotice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.",
                "citation": {
                    "@type": "CreativeWork",
                    "name": "Remote Credential Guard",
                    "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/remote-credential-guard",
                    "datePublished": "2026-03-29"
                }
            }
        ]
    }
}