{ "api_version": "1", "kind": "dse_post", "self": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "item": { "id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "slug": "make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "alternate_urls": { "markdown": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners.md", "json": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/" }, "title": "Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners", "summary": "Use 29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "format": { "slug": "explainer", "name": "Explainer" }, "priority": { "slug": "advisory", "name": "Advisory" }, "featured": false, "image": { "theme": "continuity-recovery", "label": "Continuity & recovery", "alt": "Paired infrastructure paths converging on a stable recovered service.", "card_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-card.webp?v=1.8.20", "hero_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-hero.webp?v=1.8.20", "social_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 2400, "height": 1350 }, "topics": [ { "slug": "business-continuity", "name": "Business Continuity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/business-continuity/" }, { "slug": "cybersecurity", "name": "Cybersecurity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/" } ], "author": { "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "type": "Organization" }, "publisher": { "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/" }, "published_at": "2026-08-27T12:12:33+00:00", "modified_at": "2026-08-27T13:04:10+00:00", "reviewed_on": "2026-08-26", "reading_minutes": 3, "word_count": 567, "potentially_affected": "Teams, systems, services, or facilities within the stated scope of 29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans", "dse_recommendation": "Compare the observed state with the cited official source, document applicability and exceptions, and test any approved change with rollback safeguards.", "primary_source": { "name": "29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans", "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/section-1910.39", "published_on": null, "authority": "www.ecfr.gov" }, "publishing_principles": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usage_info": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyright_notice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "content_html": "

Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.

\n

Source fact:

\n

The official 29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans from Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:

\n\n

Only the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.

\n

What the source does not establish

\n

Federal workplace rule with conditional applicability; it is not a substitute for fire code, emergency action planning, or site-specific engineering. Do not read the source as proof of implementation or permission to change production. Its guidance remains conditional on identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery and the environment’s recorded constraints.

\n

Applicability questions

\n\n

DSE recommendation:

\n

DSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.

\n

For an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.

\n

Verification and evidence

\n

A reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)); 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.

\n

Close the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.

\n

Official references

\n", "content_text": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official 29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans from Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\nUnder 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control sources of ignition or fires. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)).\nUnder 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for the control of fuel source hazards. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nFederal workplace rule with conditional applicability; it is not a substitute for fire code, emergency action planning, or site-specific engineering. Do not read the source as proof of implementation or permission to change production. Its guidance remains conditional on identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery and the environment’s recorded constraints.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)); 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\nOfficial references\n\n29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans — Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR", "content_markdown": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\n\n## Source fact:\n\nThe official [29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/section-1910.39) from Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\n- Under 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control sources of ignition or fires. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)).\n\n- Under 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for the control of fuel source hazards. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\n\n## What the source does not establish\n\nFederal workplace rule with conditional applicability; it is not a substitute for fire code, emergency action planning, or site-specific engineering. Do not read the source as proof of implementation or permission to change production. Its guidance remains conditional on identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery and the environment’s recorded constraints.\n\n## Applicability questions\n\n- For source statement 1 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- For source statement 2 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- Which deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\n\n- How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\n\n- Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\n## DSE recommendation:\n\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\n\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\n\n## Verification and evidence\n\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)); 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\n\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\n\n## Official references\n\n- [29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/section-1910.39) — Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR" }, "json_ld": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization", "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "alternateName": "DSE Security", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/dse-logo-20260812.png?v=1.8.20" } }, { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "parentOrganization": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" } }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website", "name": "DSE Updates", "alternateName": "DSE Security Knowledge Hub", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "inLanguage": "en-US", "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "potentialAction": { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": { "@type": "EntryPoint", "urlTemplate": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/?q={search_term_string}" }, "query-input": "required name=search_term_string" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website" }, "lastReviewed": "2026-08-26" }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/#breadcrumbs", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "DSE Updates", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/" } ] }, { "@type": [ "Article", "TechArticle" ], "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/#article", "identifier": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/", "headline": "Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners", "description": "Use 29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "abstract": "Use 29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "articleBody": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official 29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans from Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\nUnder 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for maintaining equipment to prevent or control sources of ignition or fires. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)).\nUnder 29 CFR 1910, the rule requires that a fire prevention plan include the name or job title of employees responsible for the control of fuel source hazards. The research record locates this support at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nFederal workplace rule with conditional applicability; it is not a substitute for fire code, emergency action planning, or site-specific engineering. Do not read the source as proof of implementation or permission to change production. Its guidance remains conditional on identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery and the environment’s recorded constraints.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(4), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(4)); 29 CFR 1910.39(c)(5), read with 29 CFR 1910.39(c) (eCFR anchor p-1910.39(c)(5)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\nOfficial references\n\n29 CFR 1910.39 – Fire prevention plans — Occupational Safety and Health Administration via eCFR", "datePublished": "2026-08-27T12:12:33+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-08-27T13:04:10+00:00", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "isAccessibleForFree": true, "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/make-the-fire-prevention-plan-name-hazards-controls-and-owners/#primaryimage", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "contentUrl": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 1200, "height": 630, "caption": "Make the fire-prevention plan name hazards, controls, and owners" }, "articleSection": [ "Business Continuity", "Cybersecurity" ], "keywords": [ "Business Continuity", "Cybersecurity", "Explainer", "Advisory priority" ], "genre": "Explainer", "about": [ { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Business Continuity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/business-continuity/" }, { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Cybersecurity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/" } ], "wordCount": 567, "timeRequired": "PT3M", "publishingPrinciples": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usageInfo": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyrightHolder": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "copyrightNotice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "citation": { "@type": "CreativeWork", "name": "29 CFR 1910.39 - Fire prevention plans", "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/section-1910.39" } } ] } }