{ "api_version": "1", "kind": "dse_post", "self": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "item": { "id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "slug": "manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "alternate_urls": { "markdown": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications.md", "json": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/" }, "title": "Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications", "summary": "Use View and manage security alerts to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "format": { "slug": "explainer", "name": "Explainer" }, "priority": { "slug": "advisory", "name": "Advisory" }, "featured": false, "image": { "theme": "identity-cloud", "label": "Identity & cloud", "alt": "Governed cloud identity system with connected service and lifecycle nodes.", "card_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/identity-cloud-card.webp?v=1.8.20", "hero_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/identity-cloud-hero.webp?v=1.8.20", "social_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/identity-cloud-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 2400, "height": 1350 }, "topics": [ { "slug": "cybersecurity", "name": "Cybersecurity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/" }, { "slug": "it", "name": "IT", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/" }, { "slug": "microsoft-365-identity", "name": "Microsoft 365 & Identity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/microsoft-365-identity/" } ], "author": { "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "type": "Organization" }, "publisher": { "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/" }, "published_at": "2026-08-27T12:12:58+00:00", "modified_at": "2026-08-27T13:04:09+00:00", "reviewed_on": "2026-08-26", "reading_minutes": 3, "word_count": 506, "potentially_affected": "Teams, systems, services, or facilities within the stated scope of View and manage security alerts", "dse_recommendation": "Compare the observed state with the cited official source, document applicability and exceptions, and test any approved change with rollback safeguards.", "primary_source": { "name": "View and manage security alerts", "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/understanding-security-alerts", "published_on": "2026-07-02", "authority": "Microsoft Learn" }, "publishing_principles": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usage_info": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyright_notice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "content_html": "

Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.

\n

Source fact:

\n

The official View and manage security alerts from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:

\n\n

Only the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions after confirming that the source and deployed context match.

\n

What the source does not establish

\n

Queue defaults are not a retention policy, and classification requires investigation evidence and the organization’s incident process. The citation is not a substitute for observed state, authorization, compliance evidence, or dependency health. Examine Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations before translating the source into an operational decision.

\n

Applicability questions

\n\n

DSE recommendation:

\n

DSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.

\n

Do not move from citation to production in one step. Pilot the decision where practical, observe agreed signals, retain a reversal point, and verify Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations. Handle credentials, keys, recovery data, and personal information through approved secure channels.

\n

Verification and evidence

\n

A reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from Opening queue description; Opening scope statement through sanitized alerts, source events, entity timelines, tuning conditions, exclusion scope, analyst findings, and response outcomes. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.

\n

Preserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.

\n

Official references

\n", "content_text": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official View and manage security alerts from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\nBy default, the alerts queue shows alerts seen in the previous seven days in a grouped view with the newest alerts first. The research record locates this support at Opening queue description.\nThe documented workflow covers viewing, filtering, investigating, classifying, and managing Defender for Identity security alerts. The research record locates this support at Opening scope statement.\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nQueue defaults are not a retention policy, and classification requires investigation evidence and the organization’s incident process. The citation is not a substitute for observed state, authorization, compliance evidence, or dependency health. Examine Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations before translating the source into an operational decision.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at Opening queue description, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at Opening scope statement, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nDo not move from citation to production in one step. Pilot the decision where practical, observe agreed signals, retain a reversal point, and verify Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations. Handle credentials, keys, recovery data, and personal information through approved secure channels.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from Opening queue description; Opening scope statement through sanitized alerts, source events, entity timelines, tuning conditions, exclusion scope, analyst findings, and response outcomes. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\nOfficial references\n\nView and manage security alerts — Microsoft", "content_markdown": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\n\n## Source fact:\n\nThe official [View and manage security alerts](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/understanding-security-alerts) from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\n- By default, the alerts queue shows alerts seen in the previous seven days in a grouped view with the newest alerts first. The research record locates this support at Opening queue description.\n\n- The documented workflow covers viewing, filtering, investigating, classifying, and managing Defender for Identity security alerts. The research record locates this support at Opening scope statement.\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\n\n## What the source does not establish\n\nQueue defaults are not a retention policy, and classification requires investigation evidence and the organization’s incident process. The citation is not a substitute for observed state, authorization, compliance evidence, or dependency health. Examine Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations before translating the source into an operational decision.\n\n## Applicability questions\n\n- For source statement 1 at Opening queue description, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- For source statement 2 at Opening scope statement, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- Which deployed instance of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\n\n- How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations?\n\n- Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\n## DSE recommendation:\n\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\n\nDo not move from citation to production in one step. Pilot the decision where practical, observe agreed signals, retain a reversal point, and verify Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations. Handle credentials, keys, recovery data, and personal information through approved secure channels.\n\n## Verification and evidence\n\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from Opening queue description; Opening scope statement through sanitized alerts, source events, entity timelines, tuning conditions, exclusion scope, analyst findings, and response outcomes. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\n\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\n\n## Official references\n\n- [View and manage security alerts](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/understanding-security-alerts) — Microsoft" }, "json_ld": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization", "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering", "alternateName": "DSE Security", "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/dse-logo-20260812.png?v=1.8.20" } }, { "@type": "Organization", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "parentOrganization": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" } }, { "@type": "WebSite", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website", "name": "DSE Updates", "alternateName": "DSE Security Knowledge Hub", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/", "inLanguage": "en-US", "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "potentialAction": { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": { "@type": "EntryPoint", "urlTemplate": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/?q={search_term_string}" }, "query-input": "required name=search_term_string" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "isPartOf": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website" }, "lastReviewed": "2026-08-26" }, { "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/#breadcrumbs", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "DSE Updates", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications", "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/" } ] }, { "@type": [ "Article", "TechArticle" ], "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/#article", "identifier": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/", "headline": "Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications", "description": "Use View and manage security alerts to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "abstract": "Use View and manage security alerts to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.", "articleBody": "Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official View and manage security alerts from Microsoft supports the following bounded statements:\n\nBy default, the alerts queue shows alerts seen in the previous seven days in a grouped view with the newest alerts first. The research record locates this support at Opening queue description.\nThe documented workflow covers viewing, filtering, investigating, classifying, and managing Defender for Identity security alerts. The research record locates this support at Opening scope statement.\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nQueue defaults are not a retention policy, and classification requires investigation evidence and the organization’s incident process. The citation is not a substitute for observed state, authorization, compliance evidence, or dependency health. Examine Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations before translating the source into an operational decision.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at Opening queue description, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at Opening scope statement, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of identity detections, contributing events, entities, alert logic, tuning, exclusions, investigation, and response decisions, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nDo not move from citation to production in one step. Pilot the decision where practical, observe agreed signals, retain a reversal point, and verify Active Directory, Windows DNS, sensor health, time, network visibility, cloud analytics, endpoint evidence, and security operations. Handle credentials, keys, recovery data, and personal information through approved secure channels.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from Opening queue description; Opening scope statement through sanitized alerts, source events, entity timelines, tuning conditions, exclusion scope, analyst findings, and response outcomes. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nPreserve both successful and failed observations, along with approval and rollback evidence. Avoid uncontrolled production experiments. Assign an expiry or event-driven recheck so the conclusion is not treated as permanent.\nOfficial references\n\nView and manage security alerts — Microsoft", "datePublished": "2026-08-27T12:12:58+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-08-27T13:04:09+00:00", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/" }, "inLanguage": "en-US", "isAccessibleForFree": true, "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team" }, "publisher": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/manage-seven-day-identity-alert-queue-with-filters-and-classifications/#primaryimage", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/identity-cloud-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "contentUrl": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/identity-cloud-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20", "width": 1200, "height": 630, "caption": "Manage the seven-day identity alert queue with explicit filters and classifications" }, "articleSection": [ "Cybersecurity", "IT", "Microsoft 365 & Identity" ], "keywords": [ "Cybersecurity", "IT", "Microsoft 365 & Identity", "Explainer", "Advisory priority" ], "genre": "Explainer", "about": [ { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Cybersecurity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/" }, { "@type": "Thing", "name": "IT", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/it/" }, { "@type": "Thing", "name": "Microsoft 365 & Identity", "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/microsoft-365-identity/" } ], "wordCount": 506, "timeRequired": "PT3M", "publishingPrinciples": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/", "usageInfo": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/", "copyrightHolder": { "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization" }, "copyrightNotice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.", "citation": { "@type": "CreativeWork", "name": "View and manage security alerts", "url": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/understanding-security-alerts", "datePublished": "2026-07-02" } } ] } }