{
    "api_version": "1",
    "kind": "dse_post",
    "self": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
    "item": {
        "id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
        "slug": "plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk",
        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
        "alternate_urls": {
            "markdown": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk.md",
            "json": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/api/v1/posts/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/"
        },
        "title": "Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk",
        "summary": "Use 42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
        "format": {
            "slug": "checklist",
            "name": "Checklist"
        },
        "priority": {
            "slug": "advisory",
            "name": "Advisory"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "image": {
            "theme": "continuity-recovery",
            "label": "Continuity & recovery",
            "alt": "Paired infrastructure paths converging on a stable recovered service.",
            "card_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-card.webp?v=1.8.20",
            "hero_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-hero.webp?v=1.8.20",
            "social_url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
            "width": 2400,
            "height": 1350
        },
        "topics": [
            {
                "slug": "business-continuity",
                "name": "Business Continuity",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/business-continuity/"
            },
            {
                "slug": "cybersecurity",
                "name": "Cybersecurity",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/"
            }
        ],
        "author": {
            "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
            "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team",
            "type": "Organization"
        },
        "publisher": {
            "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering",
            "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/"
        },
        "published_at": "2026-08-27T12:12:09+00:00",
        "modified_at": "2026-08-27T13:06:58+00:00",
        "reviewed_on": "2026-08-26",
        "reading_minutes": 3,
        "word_count": 609,
        "potentially_affected": "Teams, systems, services, or facilities within the stated scope of 42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness",
        "dse_recommendation": "Compare the observed state with the cited official source, document applicability and exceptions, and test any approved change with rollback safeguards.",
        "primary_source": {
            "name": "42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness",
            "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54",
            "published_on": null,
            "authority": "www.ecfr.gov"
        },
        "publishing_principles": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/",
        "usage_info": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/",
        "copyright_notice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.",
        "content_html": "<p>Treat this document as a focused evidence review: Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.</p>\n<h2>Source fact:</h2>\n<p>The official <a href=\"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">42 CFR 416.54 &#8211; Emergency preparedness</a> from Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Under 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that if elected, the unified and integrated emergency preparedness program include integrated policies and procedures that meet the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a coordinated communication plan and training and testing programs that meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, respectively. The research record locates this support at <strong>42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5))</strong>.</li>\n<li>Under 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that the ASC develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The research record locates this support at <strong>42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d))</strong>.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Only the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.</p>\n<h2>What the source does not establish</h2>\n<p>ASC-specific federal condition for coverage; patient acuity, evacuation, anesthesia, utilities, state licensing, accreditation, and survey guidance require facility-specific planning. A correct source interpretation can still be inapplicable to a particular design. Confirm identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery, ownership, and change authority instead of treating documented behavior as a deployment guarantee.</p>\n<h2>Applicability questions</h2>\n<ul>\n<li>For source statement 1 at <strong>42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5))</strong>, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?</li>\n<li>For source statement 2 at <strong>42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d))</strong>, which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?</li>\n<li>Which deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?</li>\n<li>How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?</li>\n<li>Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?</li>\n</ul>\n<h2>DSE recommendation:</h2>\n<p>DSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.</p>\n<p>For an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.</p>\n<h2>Verification and evidence</h2>\n<p>A reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from <strong>42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5))</strong>; <strong>42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d))</strong> through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.</p>\n<p>Close the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today&#8217;s observation is not a continuing guarantee.</p>\n<h2>Official references</h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">42 CFR 416.54 &#8211; Emergency preparedness</a> — Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services via eCFR</li>\n</ul>",
        "content_text": "Treat this document as a focused evidence review: Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official 42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\nUnder 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that if elected, the unified and integrated emergency preparedness program include integrated policies and procedures that meet the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a coordinated communication plan and training and testing programs that meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, respectively. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)).\nUnder 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that the ASC develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nASC-specific federal condition for coverage; patient acuity, evacuation, anesthesia, utilities, state licensing, accreditation, and survey guidance require facility-specific planning. A correct source interpretation can still be inapplicable to a particular design. Confirm identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery, ownership, and change authority instead of treating documented behavior as a deployment guarantee.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)); 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\nOfficial references\n\n42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR",
        "content_markdown": "Treat this document as a focused evidence review: Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\n\n## Source fact:\n\nThe official [42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54) from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\n- Under 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that if elected, the unified and integrated emergency preparedness program include integrated policies and procedures that meet the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a coordinated communication plan and training and testing programs that meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, respectively. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)).\n\n- Under 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that the ASC develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\n\n## What the source does not establish\n\nASC-specific federal condition for coverage; patient acuity, evacuation, anesthesia, utilities, state licensing, accreditation, and survey guidance require facility-specific planning. A correct source interpretation can still be inapplicable to a particular design. Confirm identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery, ownership, and change authority instead of treating documented behavior as a deployment guarantee.\n\n## Applicability questions\n\n- For source statement 1 at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- For source statement 2 at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\n\n- Which deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\n\n- How will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\n\n- Who approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\n## DSE recommendation:\n\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\n\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\n\n## Verification and evidence\n\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)); 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\n\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\n\n## Official references\n\n- [42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR"
    },
    "json_ld": {
        "@context": "https://schema.org",
        "@graph": [
            {
                "@type": "Organization",
                "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization",
                "name": "Detection Systems & Engineering",
                "alternateName": "DSE Security",
                "url": "https://dsesecurity.com/",
                "logo": {
                    "@type": "ImageObject",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/dse-logo-20260812.png?v=1.8.20"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "Organization",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team",
                "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/",
                "parentOrganization": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "WebSite",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website",
                "name": "DSE Updates",
                "alternateName": "DSE Security Knowledge Hub",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/",
                "inLanguage": "en-US",
                "publisher": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "potentialAction": {
                    "@type": "SearchAction",
                    "target": {
                        "@type": "EntryPoint",
                        "urlTemplate": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/?q={search_term_string}"
                    },
                    "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
                }
            },
            {
                "@type": "WebPage",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
                "isPartOf": {
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#website"
                },
                "lastReviewed": "2026-08-26"
            },
            {
                "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/#breadcrumbs",
                "itemListElement": [
                    {
                        "@type": "ListItem",
                        "position": 1,
                        "name": "DSE Updates",
                        "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/"
                    },
                    {
                        "@type": "ListItem",
                        "position": 2,
                        "name": "Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk",
                        "item": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/"
                    }
                ]
            },
            {
                "@type": [
                    "Article",
                    "TechArticle"
                ],
                "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/#article",
                "identifier": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
                "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/",
                "headline": "Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk",
                "description": "Use 42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
                "abstract": "Use 42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.",
                "articleBody": "Treat this document as a focused evidence review: Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.\nSource fact:\nThe official 42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:\n\nUnder 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that if elected, the unified and integrated emergency preparedness program include integrated policies and procedures that meet the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, a coordinated communication plan and training and testing programs that meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, respectively. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)).\nUnder 42 CFR 416, the rule requires that the ASC develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The research record locates this support at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)).\n\nOnly the traced statements above are asserted as source facts. Apply the review to essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives after confirming that the source and deployed context match.\nWhat the source does not establish\nASC-specific federal condition for coverage; patient acuity, evacuation, anesthesia, utilities, state licensing, accreditation, and survey guidance require facility-specific planning. A correct source interpretation can still be inapplicable to a particular design. Confirm identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery, ownership, and change authority instead of treating documented behavior as a deployment guarantee.\nApplicability questions\n\nFor source statement 1 at 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nFor source statement 2 at 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?\nWhich deployed instance of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives will be compared with the source, and why that instance?\nHow will the review distinguish a source mismatch from a failure in identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery?\nWho approves the conclusion, exception, test window, and rollback threshold?\n\nDSE recommendation:\nDSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Begin by recording scope and current state before deciding whether a change is warranted. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.\nFor an approved change, define prerequisites, a limited test path, success and stop conditions, monitoring, and rollback. Check identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery in design order. Protect credentials, keys, recovery material, personal data, and sensitive topology in evidence.\nVerification and evidence\nA reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 42 CFR 416.54(e)(5), read with 42 CFR 416.54(e) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(e)(5)); 42 CFR 416.54(d) (eCFR anchor p-416.54(d)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.\nClose the review only when the evidence, exception handling, resulting action, and after-state are linked. Schedule a new review after material technical, organizational, incident, or source changes; today’s observation is not a continuing guarantee.\nOfficial references\n\n42 CFR 416.54 – Emergency preparedness — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services via eCFR",
                "datePublished": "2026-08-27T12:12:09+00:00",
                "dateModified": "2026-08-27T13:06:58+00:00",
                "mainEntityOfPage": {
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/"
                },
                "inLanguage": "en-US",
                "isAccessibleForFree": true,
                "author": {
                    "@type": "Organization",
                    "name": "DSE Security Editorial Team",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/#editorial-team"
                },
                "publisher": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "image": {
                    "@type": "ImageObject",
                    "@id": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/plan-ambulatory-surgery-continuity-around-same-day-patient-risk/#primaryimage",
                    "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
                    "contentUrl": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/assets/editorial/continuity-recovery-social-v2.jpg?v=1.8.20",
                    "width": 1200,
                    "height": 630,
                    "caption": "Plan ambulatory-surgery continuity around same-day patient risk"
                },
                "articleSection": [
                    "Business Continuity",
                    "Cybersecurity"
                ],
                "keywords": [
                    "Business Continuity",
                    "Cybersecurity",
                    "Checklist",
                    "Advisory priority"
                ],
                "genre": "Checklist",
                "about": [
                    {
                        "@type": "Thing",
                        "name": "Business Continuity",
                        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/business-continuity/"
                    },
                    {
                        "@type": "Thing",
                        "name": "Cybersecurity",
                        "url": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/topic/cybersecurity/"
                    }
                ],
                "wordCount": 609,
                "timeRequired": "PT3M",
                "publishingPrinciples": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/updates/dse-updates-editorial-methodology/",
                "usageInfo": "https://update.dsesecurity.com/usage/",
                "copyrightHolder": {
                    "@id": "https://dsesecurity.com/#organization"
                },
                "copyrightNotice": "Copyright © 2026 Detection Systems & Engineering. All rights reserved.",
                "citation": {
                    "@type": "CreativeWork",
                    "name": "42 CFR 416.54 - Emergency preparedness",
                    "url": "https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-42/section-416.54"
                }
            }
        ]
    }
}