Govern storage as infrastructure—not just capacity

Bottom line: storage is a managed system with identities, networks, controllers, software, replication, protection copies, keys, and recovery behavior. Available capacity and successful writes do not prove that access, isolation, change control, or restoration are safe.

Source fact: what NIST covers

NIST SP 800-209 describes the evolution of storage from direct-attached block, file, and object services toward networked, virtualized, software-defined, hyper-converged, and cloud-based models. NIST links increasing architectural and management complexity to configuration-error and security risk. Its recommendations span common infrastructure disciplines—physical security, authentication and authorization, change and configuration control, incident response, and recovery—plus storage-specific concerns such as data protection, isolation, restoration assurance, and encryption.

The source supports assessing storage as more than media. Management and recovery paths are part of the security design.

What the source does not establish

The publication does not certify a storage product, cloud tier, snapshot, replication design, or backup. Encryption does not prove separation from an attacker who controls the relevant identity or key service. Replication can copy unwanted change, and a snapshot is not automatically an independent, retained, or restorable copy.

Actual controls vary by protocol, topology, service model, license, firmware and software version, tenancy, key ownership, and operational responsibility.

Applicability questions

Which applications and data use each block, file, or object service, and what are their recovery objectives?

Which identities can administer, read, write, delete, snapshot, replicate, restore, or change retention and keys?

What data and management networks, APIs, consoles, and support channels reach the platform?

Which failures, deletions, corruption, or compromises can propagate to replicas and protection copies?

What independent evidence proves a useful restoration at the required scale?

DSE recommendation: build a storage control map

The following steps are DSE recommendations based on the cited source.

Inventory storage services, physical and logical components, data classes, applications, owners, protocols, management paths, dependencies, protection methods, and support status.

Separate data access, storage administration, backup administration, key administration, and audit access where risk justifies it. Review inherited and automation permissions.

Baseline security-relevant configuration and monitor changes to access, exports, shares, buckets, replication, retention, immutability, snapshots, deletion, and encryption.

Map failure domains. Record which credentials, control planes, regions, arrays, networks, directories, and key services are shared between production and recovery copies.

Test restoration of representative data and complete services. Include identity, permissions, application consistency, key availability, name resolution, capacity, and elapsed time.

Prepare evidence-preserving incident actions that do not erase the only useful copy or spread a destructive change.

Verification and evidence

Retain the inventory, architecture and failure-domain map, access reviews, configuration baseline and change records, key-dependency record, protection and retention configuration, monitoring events, restore test results, and exception register. A restore test should identify the exact source copy, target, date, data and application validation, and unresolved gaps.

Official references

NIST SP 800-209 — Security Guidelines for Storage Infrastructure — National Institute of Standards and Technology; finalized October 26, 2020