What you need to know
Use 44 CFR 201.7 - Tribal Mitigation Plans to review this narrow operational decision without extending the source beyond its stated scope.
Potentially affected
Teams, systems, services, or facilities within the stated scope of 44 CFR 201.7 - Tribal Mitigation Plans
DSE recommendation
Compare the observed state with the cited official source, document applicability and exceptions, and test any approved change with rollback safeguards.
Frame this document as a source-led configuration and assurance check: Preserve tribal authority and participation throughout mitigation planning. Only the official source and traced locations below supply facts. Confirm applicability before acting.
Source fact:
The official 44 CFR 201.7 – Tribal Mitigation Plans from Federal Emergency Management Agency via eCFR supports the following bounded statements:
- Under 44 CFR 201, the rule requires that indian Tribal governments review and revise their plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit it for approval within 5 years in order to continue to be eligible for non-emergency Stafford Act assistance and FEMA mitigation grant funding. The research record locates this support at 44 CFR 201.7(d)(3) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(d)(3)).
- Under 44 CFR 201, the rule requires that indian Tribal governments applying to FEMA as a recipient have an approved Tribal Mitigation Plan meeting the requirements of this section as a condition of receiving non-emergency Stafford Act assistance and FEMA mitigation grants. The research record locates this support at 44 CFR 201.7(a)(1) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(a)(1)).
These statements are the factual basis for this document. Do not extend them into a broader assurance. Review essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives only where the source and recorded environment align.
What the source does not establish
Federal hazard-mitigation regulation for tribal governments; recipient or subrecipient role, sovereignty, hazards, consultation, FEMA guidance, plan status, and grant program rules require authoritative review. No current deployment state or change approval follows from the source alone. Validate identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery, and treat examples or options as conditional inputs rather than defaults.
Applicability questions
- For source statement 1 at 44 CFR 201.7(d)(3) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(d)(3)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?
- For source statement 2 at 44 CFR 201.7(a)(1) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(a)(1)), which observable configuration, record, or test can confirm applicability here?
- Which owner can attest to the recorded state of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, including exceptions?
- What baseline for identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery must accompany the source-specific observation?
- Which success, stop, and escalation criteria are written before testing begins?
DSE recommendation:
DSE recommends using the cited source as the evidence anchor for this decision. Start with applicability, then compare the observed state with the cited source. Record the source location, examined part of essential functions, upstream providers, recovery sequences, alternate work paths, and tested recovery objectives, observed and expected states, owner, and reason for deviation.
An implementation decision needs an owner, approved window, prechecks, observable outcome, stop authority, and rollback path. Validate identity, DNS, communications, facilities, suppliers, and the people authorized to invoke recovery before and after the test, and store only sanitized operational evidence.
Verification and evidence
A reviewer should be able to retrace the decision from 44 CFR 201.7(d)(3) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(d)(3)); 44 CFR 201.7(a)(1) (eCFR anchor p-201.7(a)(1)) through business-impact records, dependency maps, exercise results, recovery timings, and open corrective actions. Record what was collected, where, when, by whom, and which system or role it represents.
Retain the starting state, authorization, execution record, outcome, deviation, and final state as one review package. Move disruptive checks to an approved test path. Reopen the decision when versions, design, dependencies, ownership, or official guidance changes.
Official references
- 44 CFR 201.7 – Tribal Mitigation Plans — Federal Emergency Management Agency via eCFR
Review the official source
44 CFR 201.7 - Tribal Mitigation Plans · Verified August 26, 2026
Need help applying this guidance safely?
DSE can help confirm applicability, protect service continuity, and validate the result across physical security and IT systems.
Talk with DSE